SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (616)8/20/2000 1:53:42 PM
From: StockDung   of 12465
 
Frisky calls a turd a turd. RE:fraudulent Tom Haysek/Ray Dirks analyst/meatloaf/meatloaf2

By: frisky $$$
Reply To: 25278 by meatloaf2 $$ Saturday, 19 Aug 2000 at 4:56 PM EDT
Post # of 25295


In my last post, I only offered one opinion: ZSUN is worth no more than 24 cents. The rest are facts or acts done by ZSUN.

Why do you call using Jones & Jensen as an auditor is an opinion? Why do you call using George G Chachas as ZSUN’s counsel is an opinion? Why do you call revising earnings eight time is an opinion? Why do you call exchanging its own shares with DDD, TMOT, LCAI is an opinion? Why do you call using Ray Dirks, Access 1, Security Capital Trading, Stockreporter.com as pseudo-analysts is an opinion? Why do you call lumping gain on sale of AFSI, unrealized and realized gain on marketable securities into operating activities is an opinion? Why do you call misleading investor with EBITDA is an opinion? Why do you call OIA representing 85% to 90% of ZSUN’s revenues is an opinion. Why do you call giving $6,400,000 and over 10 million shares to former OIA shareholders is an opinion? Why do you call those misleading press releases such as over-inflated earnings are opinions? Why do you call violating FASB 115 on the paper gain of AFSI to disguise the loss is an opinion?

Last May, you said ZSUN would be $30 in six to nine months. You must try harder now to pump up this garbage stock.
ragingbull.altavista.com

By: meatloaf2 $$
Reply To: 25273 by frisky $$$ Friday, 18 Aug 2000 at 8:44 PM EDT
Post # of 25295


OT: Maybe you've been living in a hole, pal, so let me remind you that OJ was found Not Guilty. Your list of grievances are nothing more than renderings of opinion, and ill-informed, grudgingly derived opinions at that.

Fortunately, it's cranks like you that lead the regulators to not bother. So, a tip-o-the-hat to you. Let me know if you want a few more email-regulator addresses to hassle. Glad ta' help ya'.

ragingbull.altavista.com
....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext