SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Lloyd who wrote (83169)8/21/2000 3:31:46 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Hi Don Lloyd; Your problem with the non-employee twin also applies to a cash based payment scheme. For instance...

Suppose that the company, which had previously used one of the standard employee compensation services to pay its employees decides to begin payment instead by leaving piles of unmarked bills in a trash can on the west side of Central Park. But later it turns out that the bills were collected by a garbage collector, who, it turns out, was capable of saving the company, and who did. Meanwhile the old employees were collecting coffee and donuts for kissing their bosses' butts. What would be the impact on the accounting numbers? (From a totally cash based example, no need to bring stock options into the mixture.)

I've come to the conclusion that you are confusing cash flow with profits. Try coming up with an example that doesn't involve twins &c., and that is not immediately translatable into an equivalently bizarre example without stock options. The intention here is not to discuss how many angels can dance on a pin head, but to determine what the best way to measure profitability in a company is.

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext