Also Richard Phillips(578) & Old Jake Justus(575)
Dear Bill and Richard; I Have noticed that both of you have mention the use of Reticulose
for the Flu and apparently may see this application as a new development goal for Dr. Hirschman.
To refresh you memories, the FDA, Christopher Tseng, Phd, has already found Reticulose to be
safe and effective against the Influenza A virus. Results of this investigation are contained
in NIH report ARB No. 89-048 of 12 October 1989. Isn't it ironic that the FDA continues to
suppress the dispensing of Reticulose even for use against the Flu?
Old Jake pointed out in Post #575, and rightfully so, that there is very little
to no justification for the FDA to have stopped the Miami, FL, Mercy Hospital AIDS tests.
What is the justification for them not to suggest, encourage or even fund the testing
of Reticulose against the Flu, when it is apparent that their own study supports its
effectiveness against the virus?
The actions, or inactions, of the FDA through out the years, has really been the
primary cause for Reticulose not being available to the Public over the past 35 years.
Hopefully, Dr. Hirschman will be able to correct the situation with the FDA. But, I
personally hope that some day the Saga of Reticulose and the actions of the FDA are revealed
to the American Public [by the official press], and that some how Congress takes the FDA to task.
Wishful thinking, no doubt.
Kingfisher |
