Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (4524)	5/17/1997 7:15:00 PM
From: E. Charters	of 14627

hope springs eternal the averages we ahve seen already..from 7 metres to almost 80 in approx thickness..I wouldn't do too much math on it without lots of infill..the geometry of the feeders is not precisely known but generally they are pipes..so we know this is probably high sulfide at one point too.. the whole deposit size so far is a known and the whole potential is a known..what is not known is the numbers at the bottom line.. this one has to wait for.. there is always a chance of hitting something unexpected on a relentless drilling program that no doubt PFG could not afford.. But again its a wait and see you flips the pesoa and takes the chance senor..and if you think its anything but a gamble then you know far more than I.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next