SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jcholewa who wrote (122911)8/22/2000 9:07:22 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) of 1579031
 
Re: "I do not mean to exacerbate this discussion, but for the 133MHz bus PIII, a notch has traditionally been 66MHz (it's gone 533, 600, 667, 733, 800, 866, 933, 1000). You may also remember that the limited availability 1000 was introduced before the 933 was released. So it is not stupid at all for somebody to argue that 1133MHz is two notches above 1GHz and that Intel may fill the gap at one point with a 1066MHz PIII (I hope they don't, as I like Intel's recent training of the market to accept hundred MHz leaps between speed grades)"

Fine, consider it anything you want. What do you think Paul Otellini meant when he said Intel may release one or two more notches above 1GHz? Will it make him a liar if Intel releases a higher speed as some fool here suggested?

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News