SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (122931)8/23/2000 12:33:42 AM
From: TechieGuy-alt  Read Replies (1) of 1578965
 
Elmer, is that an advance apology to what is looking like pretty crappy processor performance! (ok, if only in the first instance, as you put it.)

The only difference with the PPro and Pentium era was that Intel was introducing those from a position of strength. Hardly that position now from a performance standpoint.

Intel needs a processor with very good performance NOW. Not next year or the year after.

But I guess they have the Intel Mutual fund to fall back on.

TG

I don't know the answer to that one but I will say that I don't think you will see the true performance potential with the first version of P4. When the Pentium came out it was huge hot and speed limited. Only after a process conversion did it
start to shine. The PPro was huge and hard to manufacture with it's 2 die in one package. Only after a process conversion and switch to Klamath did it really take off. P4 will be the same way. It will be the performance leader, according to Intel,
but I don't think it will hit it's stride until well into 2001 when it's moved to .13u and the frequency really takes off. Until then, CuMine will remain very competitive with a few significant surprises in store that haven't been discussed anywhere in
public (AFAIK). <G>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext