SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott D. who wrote (518)5/17/1997 10:13:00 PM
From: wooden ships   of 42834
 
"The moving finger writes and having writ moves on." In re: Hillary-

Saturday May 17 7:13 PM EDT

Hillary May Face Whitewater Indictment-ABC

WASHINGTON (Reuter) - First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton could face indictment on the
Whitewater land deal, ABC News reported Saturday, quoting an audiotape of testimony by a deputy
to independent counsel Kenneth Starr.

ABC said it had obtained an audiotape of remarks by deputy independent counsel John Bates during a
closed-door appeals court proceeding earlier this year.

"We certainly are investigating individuals, and those individuals, including Mrs. Clinton, could be
indicted," Bates told the proceeding, according to ABC.

The appeals court ordered the White House to turn over notes on conversations between Mrs. Clinton
and White House lawyers, but the White House on Monday told the Supreme Court that it should not
be forced to turn over the notes.

A White House spokeswoman declined to comment on the ABC report.

Lawyers representing the office of the presidency asked the justices Monday to overturn a U.S.
appeals court ruling that the attorney-client privilege does not apply to the notes subpoenaed by Starr.

President Clinton and his wife have not been accused of any wrongdoing in Starr's long-running
investigation into the Whitewater affair, a complex web of Arkansas business deals involving the
Clintons and allegations of cover-up.

The Supreme Court is expected to decide by the end of next month whether to grant or deny the
appeal. If the appeal is granted, arguments would be scheduled during the court term that begins in
October.

The White House asserted in the appeal that the longstanding legal doctrine of attorney-client privilege
applied to the conversations that Mrs. Clinton had with a team of government and private lawyers.

The privilege has been recognized as protecting conversations between attorneys and their clients from
disclosure on the grounds such discussion require confidentiality.

But Starr has said White House lawyers, as government employees rather than the Clintons' personal
lawyers, were "duty-bound" to turn over the disputed notes. He also said the unprecedented claims of
privilege by the White House had delayed his investigation for months.

Copyright 1997 Reuters

--------------------------------

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext