SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Logain Ablar who wrote (4607)8/23/2000 5:25:46 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) of 30051
 
My rationale was very similar to yours, I sold at $81.25 in order to get back in above $76 (I had an order at $78, not filled), but strength came back in I paid the piper another $.25 ($81.5). Since the low $50, I have done that with SNDK few times, kind of an insurance in the last few weeks of uncertainty. Nevertheless, I paid the piper once (sold at $63.25 and got back in at $64.5), but the piper paid back twice (sold at $73.5 bought back at $72.5 and sold again at $75 and bought back at $72.5), so paying the piper $.25 today did not hurt that much. (VBG). All in all, if I knew ahead of time that this move will conquer $73 and continue straight ahead, I would not have played these "in and out", but unfortunately, I know not the future, and despite the summer, I was shaking like an "Autumn leaf" (Arakis graduates surely know that expression). I must admit, I do the "rambus dance" better (VVBG).

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext