| I should continue. First, revenue is up, but an insider, M. Herman Tumurcuoglu, head of Mamma.com, sold: 47,700 shares, directly and indirectly, at $US 2.75 to 3.75 from July 13 to 18. Never, repeat NEVER, a good sign when an insider, and M. Tumurcuoglu is one, sells at so low a price. But, he, and other insiders, this I know first hand, are sometimes, but not often, wrong. Still revenue is up, but there still is a net loss per share. So... this is the best of times, and the worst of times...to paraphrase Dickens. Now, continuing...I, at first, thought the January 2000 breakout was the real thing--the long expected event. Read my post.` But, the follow up FUNDAMENTAL facts/events soon convinced me otherwise [read my posts on other boards, as well as my E-mails]. Why? IPO-ing incubatees is NOT A PRODUCT! Claiming Iwav as your baby when you own only 3% makes people think you have lost your mind to say nothing about your business sense/ability. Advertising Mamma.com rather than IPOing it is a MISTAKE. Any former advertising person, no current one would admit this, knows that a service like Mamma.com can not be mass market advertised. It's not a detergent. So, the Mamma.com crowd pushed up INTA's share price, but we all know what happened. So, I ,or one, think the J-Billing, which is a product/service, will ultimately push INTA's share price into the stratosphere. Why? The internet is here to stay. It's first, and most important use will be to help people MAKE MONEY. Billing (and collecting) via the net, by wire-or-less, is a core concern for those who want to make money (and stay in business), so J-Billing is a core concern -- and the FUTURE. |
