Your original response to me was that I was "moralizing" and implied that I was being self-righteous.
Your 'defense' of your position is that Clinton did not have sex with Lewinsky based on your definition of "sex".
I'm not talking about "sex". I'm talking about RIGHT and WRONG.
You say he was right, and I say he was wrong.
So, if I am "moralizing" because I think that a 53 year old man, who happens to be the President of the United States, and who happens to be married, and who gets a BJ (or maybe more than one) from one of his staff who happens to be 21 years old, in the White House, and then lies about it publicly, is way, way wrong...
...then you're right. I am moralizing. I don't know if you are male or female, but I'll tell you this: under most circumstances, a married woman who finds out her husband got a hummer in his office from some chick that is 30 years younger than he is, is going to look at it like the dude did something wrong unless she's doing the nasty behind his back too.
Your argument is based not upon facts, but upon emotion. You're tap dancing, and you know it. You know you are. |
