SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.50+2.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (108363)8/25/2000 4:53:51 PM
From: EricRR  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
When one considers that Itanium is on a .25u process, it's a pretty high frequency for any chip to hit.


I agree, if you're sure its true. I asked SemiConEng that question and he demured. Why would Intel ruin their launch of this product by using obsolete Fabs? Do 0.18 Celerons and Timna's really deserve priority? I find it hard to believe that Intel made a business decision to keep Itanium on 0.25, unless they decided the design was a loser, and process tech couldn't help.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News