SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ask DrBob

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kleht who wrote (1792)8/26/2000 2:17:22 AM
From: Drbob512  Read Replies (1) of 100058
 
kleht: Thanks for the very nice research information on the put/call ratio in particular. One of my specialties is apparently the same as yours, which is Market Psychology, or as I like to call it, Psychological Analysis, as compared to Fundamental or Technical Analysis or Monetary Analysis.

I follow the same indicators you do for Psychological factors/indicators, and have noticed that the Public/NYSE specialist short sales ratio has declined to .80, which is neutral at best. The put/call ratio has been bearish for most of the past 6 months, with the exception of a slight blip up in April, as I recall, in the CBOE put/call ratio, which I like better than the OEX one.

Sentiment is definitely too bullish for my tastes, but the bullish advisors have actually declined to 47% recently from over 50% in July, so it is not as bearish as the put/call ratio. BTW, the sentiment readings are not always very timely, as readings can stay high for months before the major correction comes, which is inevitable. I made the forecast in mid-March for a major correction in April and May, from a combination of technicals, including sentiment being too bullish, double top, bearish divergences, and extreme overvaluations.

I do not necessarily agree with the idea that TA is the effect and Psychological factors are the cause. I believe they both are reflections of price actions and supply/demand factors in the marketplace. If we could identify causation, we'd be gazillionaires for sure!!!

As I have outlined in my TA,FA,MA,PA articles previously at RB (and they will be updated for SI in the upcoming weeks), there are so many factors affecting supply/demand that TA is the single best indication for future prices, though I use all 4 analyses.

Seasonally, you are right that September is historically the worst month of the year for the bulls. That is sometimes caused by a July-August rally to retest April highs in past years. This year seems to be a little different in that there was a huge crash in the Nasdaq from March to May, and there is a lack of bearish divergences right now in the technicals.

I am not ruling out a weak September, but that appears to be unlikely right now. I am looking for mild weakness for the next few days, up to a week or two, but expect a retest of 4280 at a minimum, and probably a breakout above that in September/October. So Sept could have a trading range between 3905 and 4400 or so.

And don't you dare just lurk, with all of your insights and knowledge!!!! Post a lot here, ok?

Best wishes,

Dr.Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext