SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 46.96-2.8%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: f.simons who wrote (108630)8/27/2000 8:06:01 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
Re: For a long time, increasing speed was important. Applications ran noticeably better for the average user on a p120 vs a 486. But now, you need complicated machinery to detect the difference ...

When the 486-25 came out, it was repeatedly stated that it wasn't expected to ever be used for desktops, only servers, because nobody would ever need that kind of speed on a desktop. I remember working with early 486 servers, and being awed by their speed.

Then Pentium was going to be a "server only" chip.

Then the Pentium Pro core (Pentium II).

etc.

I fell for it a couple of times, but I've learned. Developers keep finding a use for that power and pretty soon "more speed than anyone could use" becomes inadequate.

People don't buy machines for next week, they buy machines that will be useful for 2 to 3 years (or more). And it is always painful to have a machine less than about a third of the speed of current state of the art systems. Right now that's a 333. Next year it'll be a 600, and the year after that only 1 Gigahertz or faster will do.

People are buying for the year after next - they've learned the hard way that the cost and disruption of changing machines is such that getting an extra year out of a purchase is well worth spending a few extra dollars today.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext