Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 207.67

+2.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (6826)	8/28/2000 8:08:10 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) of 275872

Andreas, I think Tom said that his down clocked 1.13 GHz P3 worked perfectly so I guess it is "only" a heat problem. It would be interesting to do some tests with 1.0 Ghz parts that are produced in the new c0 stepping. If the error lied there this would be devastating news for Intel. But I don't think this is very probable. The problem is undoubtably a speedpath, which is not really a "heat problem". Some chunk of logic just doesn't run properly at 1.13GHz. This is also why the 2.0GHz P4 demo was a fraud. They were not using any of the logic which is non-functional at that speed. Scumbria

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next