SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Market Makers - What They Do and How They Do It

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Savant who wrote (387)8/28/2000 8:59:30 PM
From: Fundamentls  Read Replies (1) of 429
 
Form three is an S-3 filing, isn't it?

No, Form 3 is an Initial Filing of Equity Securities, that a corporate insider files at an IPO or when he/she joins the company or becomes an insider. It states how many shares and derivatives he/she owns directly or beneficially, and the terms of the derivatives.

An S-3 is a registration statement, often used (in this context) for a follow-on offering or to register insider shares, or both. In order for an insider to sell shares, either the shares must be registered, or they must qualify for sale under Rule 144 (a special rule that lets insiders sell unregistered stock under certain limited circumstances). Typically true insiders don't sell under Rule 144, they register the stock, so the S-3 basically signals a likely intention to sell, always in advance of and often well in advance of the actual sale.

In either case, the insider must file Form 4, which is the "revision" version of Form 3, to reflect the sales and to restate their new position. If Rule 144 is used, there is a separate filing covering the intention to sell. However, Forms 3/4/5 need not be filed until (I believe) the 10th of the month following the sale, and 144's take their sweet time because they go through the retail brokerage system in paper form before getting to the SEC.

My only point in defending the current system is that it seems to work pretty well most of the time. As to your argument that you shouldn't have to pay twice, frankly I agree - it's just not something that really ever bothered me.

Regards,
Fund
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext