SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 95.26+3.1%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (51788)8/29/2000 8:13:26 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Re: <MU's position will no doubt be that the patents are invalid and even if they are valid are unenforceable due to JEDEC.>

That's what the lawyers call a "broken kettle" defense.


No, it's called "pleading the alternative", and to not include the alternative causes of action that arise from a particular set of facts would be malpractice on the part of the attorney. If one count fails the other can be pursued, and they can both be appealed. If the alternative is not plead, that cause of action is considered to be waived and cannot be appealed.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext