Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.50

+2.6%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rob Young who wrote (109062)	8/31/2000 1:09:30 AM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: Itanium Performance Rob, You know with big iron that clock speed isn't all that important. Even at 500 Mhz, the Itanium would be faster than current Ultra Sparc II or POWER3 offerings. For example, the E10000 and the S80 use processors that are clocked about same speed. Both servers perform roughly equally. The difference is that the S80 does it with 24 processors and the E10000 does it with 64 processors. It takes Sun 40 more processors to produce results roughly the same as IBM's. Basic logic would tell you the E10000 should be 166% faster than the S80 if you only look at the processors. I'm really curious to see how bad the EPIC architecture cripples the Itanium. I want to see java benchmarks, that's all that's going to matter if it's ever going to be a webserver. chic

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next