SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Dorsey Wright & Associates. Point and Figure

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tulvio Durand who wrote (9064)8/31/2000 1:32:42 AM
From: Von  Read Replies (1) of 9427
 
In the example of the SSPI chart, the quin top buy signal was given at 8. A double top buy down at 7 1/2. Then rose to 9. With the 4 box rise above the original double top buy signal, it became a high pole by definition. If you bought the double top at 7 1/2 or the quin top at 8, when the 4 box reversal came it was a sell signal because it
retraced 50% of a high pole (Dorsey,Zieg,Burke,Taylor). This would allow you to exit at a small lose or your original entry point of 7 1/2. On this spread quin top buy we are a little late to the party anyway.
Like a lot of traders if I cannot enter a position close to the door (pull back reversal). Then the first three box reversal becomes my sell signal, I use the three box reversal for a stop loss point as the stock climbs upward, especially when it becomes a high pole. Yes, I get stopped out, but it adheres to rule #1 for me. Know offense
intended but I do not think the methodology gave a bad signal after it rose another 2 boxes above the quin top buy signal. I think the trade could have been closed out sooner adhering to P&F without a 50% haircut.
Again, everyone views things different. And I realize that I am talking after the fact instead of before...

Regards
von
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext