SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David E. Taylor who wrote (1491)8/31/2000 3:15:36 PM
From: TechieGuy-alt  Read Replies (1) of 6784
 
You guys are talking a bit above my level of understanding of OS's. Would the move to a SrongArm (or other) 32 bit processor and a new 32 bit PALM OS
present the same type of problems that MSFT faced when they moved from a 16 bit OS to the 32 bit WIN95/98, where they had to include code to handle the
thousands of legacy 16 bit and MSDOS apps that were out there? And if so, would a new 32 bit PALM OS then be more bloated, need more memory, run


Well, since I started the original discussion, I'll feel free to explain the issue at hand.

If Palm were to move it's handheld line to a different OS (say StrongArm), then the programs out there, that currently run on the Motorola Dragonball (in the current PALM's/visor's/TRg's and CLIe's) would not be able to run natively.

Most programs available are in "binary" format. What that means is that the only thing that the program contains is the "raw" instructions to the microprocessor that executes them.

The "raw instructions" for a variety of reasons are usually completely different from one processor to the other. That is why, you cannot natively execute a windows program on a sun or alpha machine.

The issues that microsoft had when moving from 16bt windows to 32bit windows was not that bad, because the later generation of X86 processors (the 486's ,Pentimus, Athlons etc.) all support native execution of all programs that were designed all the way back to the original 8086!

I don't know of any ARM core, or any other core that can execute the Dragonball processors instructions natively. Hence the problem. (and the 2 solutions that I suggested: 1. Have software emulation, 2. Have a dragonball co-processor).

TG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext