Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.75

+3.6%

Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rob Young who wrote (109160)	9/1/2000 1:25:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Rob, <It is a dumb machine.> Intel spent a considerable amount of time debunking that myth last year at Microprocessor Forum. If you haven't seen that presentation, or you haven't read the MPR article on Itanium (10/6/99), you won't know that Intel has been preaching "the right level of smarts" instead of "dumb machine" principles. There were also two more articles on MPR on the pros and cons of IA-64. The "pro" side was written by Worley and Huck, two IA-64 architects from HP and Intel, respectively. They also argue that there is much more to IA-64 than just "smart compiler on dumb machine." The "con" side was written by Marty Hopkins of IBM. Believe me, even though that guy is much more critical of IA-64 than even Pete Bannon is, his article does a more respectable job of highlighting the negatives of IA-64 than Bannon's "tuning the fiddle." <Now maybe you would have us all believe there is some sort of "secret knowledge" only the mighty Intel/HP can come up with... Prove it! You can't ...> There is no "secret knowledge." Only publicly-available knowledge which the competition refuses to believe. Never Underestimate The Power Of Denial. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next