Impressive research Mr. Vaughn,...but the squished hamster needs more data (gggggggggggggggg). Chit, you were lobbing so many damned bombs on to the poor russett cage, I had to bathe 6 times each day to get the clods of dirt out of my fur (gggggggggggggg).
I must admit, that over the past few weeks I have thought of challenging your submissions,....but you were on a roll, so I figured it was best to let you keep going,...and I was right,...you have provided lots of great information to keep me and others running the wheel. SUF has benefited greatly from the Winspear connection as well.
Now I must point to a few problems with your logic.
First,...the 1 mile per 10my erosion rate. Now I know you said that there is erosion and deposition,....but I must say that if erosion was the only factor, all our beloved cratons would be under sea level by now,...which was my point to counter your point that the Winspear Snap Lake dyke might be a root system. Indeed if we took your erosion rates from a fiord somewhere many, many miles north of Snap Lake, we would be close enough to the center of the earth to describe it as hell (really hot), after 50my to 150my,...according to hamster calculations. Gratefully I see we still live a few hundred miles above sea level,...even in these old cratons without much uplift.
If erosion rates were so high,...why were nearby pipes(to Snap Lake) spared by the erosion gods, and favoured by the deposition gods, even though their age and chemistry was similar, though not nearly as good as at the Snap Lake Dyke.
Second,...all those incredible papers of chemistry of garnets,....I submit that anything significantly over the 85% line described by Guerney(sp) (Ca to CR) could be described as better than a G10 pyrope garnet,...perhaps a G11 or G12, which Snap Lake had,.....right?!
Randy Turner thought so,...and surprisingly many promoters of other junior diamond exploration companies are talking about G11's and G12's now,...where did this thing get coined,...I don't know?!? Of course,...you are from Missouri or somewhere right?,....you might have missed great gains from SUF and DSP if you were,...even KLA (ggggggggggggggggggggg). I think folks invested in WSP looking for area plays have made you richer in the last few weeks.
Thirdly, I said I agreed with the fact that some kimberlites spewed their contents into some big dinosaurs guts,.....we agree!!!!!! Actually the dinosaurs I was talking about were the ones found in Alberta,...which were big, but protected by sedimentation,...but of course you recanted and said we had some deposition, and not just erosion of 1 mile per 10my,....we agree!!!:-)))
Now what about those alluvial diamonds found in Ontario and Quebec,...got any valuations on them,...I heard they were greatly occluded,..Indian goods perhaps,....bummer. Your NWT area still has the only high enough quality diamonds found in Canada to be mined economically to this date. Considering the mining done in Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and other areas of Canada,....that's pretty damned good.
Now what else have you beat the poor hamster up on in the last few weeks?
It's a long weekend,...give it your best shot. I will be enjoying beaches, beers, babes (and all the B's associated with the fairer sex) boats, bands, booze, BBQ's, buds, whatever other B's I can't remember right now.
I challenge you to deliver more evidence, for whatever the hell you were providing evidence for.....not really,....go out and enjoy the weekend,.....for a change we have made some money and should celebrate :-)))) |
