Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 96.40

+5.4%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mishedlo who wrote (52519)	9/4/2000 4:40:31 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) of 93625

estoppel thanks to Blakbote on the FOOL ================================================= There is an old principle in law called estoppel which in effect says that if it can be demonstrated that by your actions/inactions you you allow people or a person to breach a rule, procedure or terms of a contract, you are estopped (i.e. prevented) from suddenly applying that rule (whatever) against the persons concerned. If JEDEC has knowingly allowed members to breach their rules, and particularly if MU has breached the JEDEC rules, then MU may be estopped from using those rules against RMBS. ========================================================== My addition - Remember MU's complaint stating the "recommended viewgraph" and "something to that effect was displayed". The "recommended" wording included patents and patent applications, if the actual wording said only "patents" can this in and of itself be estoppel? If MU did not disclose its patents is that estoppel. Any legal comments on estoppel - NightOwl or others?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next