SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
PRST 0.00010000.0%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas J Engelsma who wrote (2862)5/19/1997 2:44:00 PM
From: Richard Zeng   of 11098
 
Tom,

You are indeed the experienced one in the bulls, and you do know the
challenge facing PRST.

The most daunting issue for PRST is organizational growth. If they mismanage
or do not have enough experience, we can see they will tumble for one or two
years before they get back on track.

Short term sales/earnings growth is not important to the basis of PRST
establishing itself.

Regarding Acey's cashflow argument, it seems absurd. I am surprised to see that
Acey as a technician working in one of the electrical and computer engineering
lab will be so confident about her ability to understand accounting rules.
Frankly, I never took an accounting class. Since my wife is a CPA and she
educated me a little. I happen to read a few classic accounting books. Whenever
those so-called experts on Wall Street touting a specific stock, they usually
suggest investors to ignore sales number, ignore earning number. Even though
the P/E is extremely high for that particular stock, they said it is worth buying because of the cashflow. Acey probably learned it from them, not from
the accounting classes. She still have not anwser my question as to what is
the reasonable multiple of price-to-cashflow for PRST. I can not find the anwser in either "Intellegent Investor" or "Security Analysis" written by Ben Graham.

We will see PRST at $35 in 1997. Time will tell who is right.

Richard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext