SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 473.99+0.4%Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: alydar who wrote (49022)9/7/2000 1:40:10 PM
From: sandeep  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
Blisenko:
The settlement is very unlikely unless SC decides not to take the case. If the case goes to appeals court, DOJ better settle, otherwise, this thing could drag on forever. The urgency DOJ displayed in asking the SC to take the case wouldn't gel with the time taken to get results. So, they are in driver's seat till the SC decides what to do and possibly even afterwards if SC decides to take the case. Till then, there is no reason for them to settle.

Your comments about "Ballmer and Gates were drinking to much wine" is grammatically wrong and factually couldn't be farther from truth. The problem then was that the DOJ was in driver's seat and wanted too much; this is still the case. So, settlement was impossible.

It is interesting that you have come to the same conclusion as myself about "the longer the better for MSFT's competitors". The overhang of the case will be a problem if it continues on for a couple of years...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext