SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Franco Battista who wrote (83503)9/7/2000 1:46:43 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (3) of 132070
 
Franco, If I said it was risk free 12%, then I misspoke. There is no such thing. It is most likely much better than 12%. See my example in my note to Richard below.

Your numbers make me think you are using a straight conversion, not a spread conversion. Straight conversions, both at the same strike price and exercise date, are no risk and offer returns accordingly. Spread conversions are not risk free, just extremely low risk.

However, on a spread conversion, you have to be at least slightly bullish on the stock. And, with a spread reverse conversion, you have to be slightly bearish. Once you put on a portfolio of both spread conversions and reversals, you end up with a fairly risk free portfolio with a high yield, even though each position may have slight risk.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext