Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT

GSAT 62.25

+6.2%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pcstel who wrote (16604)	9/8/2000 5:16:31 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) of 29987

Of course anyone could see that Qualcomms' patent pertaining to a "Closed loop power control in a CDMA system" would obviously be offset by the Ericsson patent "Buzzer with Zener diode in discharge path".. Actually, ETSI would probably assign the ERICY Zener patent a slightly higher value than the Power Control patent.. Resulting in the need for Qualcomm to PAY ERICY a royalty in the exchange.. pcstel, i admire your technical expertise. your description is way over my head. i believe perhaps the main reason for the QCOM spinoff is to leave the mother ship as a pure IP company. once completed, QCOM should require, imho, no cross-licensing. the resultant chip company may. i also heard Dr J's comments that the QCOM royalties remain the same regardless of CDMA flavor rolled out. i was thinking last night about how often i see companies referred to as the next QCOM around the message boards....if my understanding of the above is correct, QCOM is the next QCOM. uw back to lurk mode

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next