Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: foundation who wrote (2958)	9/10/2000 10:17:34 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) of 196568

I think Gilder's credibility is fine. If he says so, I believe it. He may not get all the details right, but that's because he's a generalist. His general views on how things will develop in the future are 99% dead-on. I like the way he "sources" things. For example, the sentence in his CDMA report re: an announcement from Q regarding a "several fold" increase in HDR's data transmission rate is followed by another sentence (unrelated) in which he refers to Q engineers. Can you put two and two together? It's unbelievable to me that the CDMA report didn't move Q's stock price. The market simply wants to keep handing us an opportunity to accumulate.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next