SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 220.66+1.6%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (108193)9/10/2000 2:13:39 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
>> In the winter, to here, the SUV is like sliced bread.

Glenn,

I totally agree. Instead of SUV, I should have said " a 7000 pound 10 passenger vehicle, usually holding just 1 occupant and getting single digit gas mileage".

But the real annoyance of SUV's is the manner in which they are driven. I dislike the tailgaiting and cut-in that seems to be expected as a right by some SUV drivers. Those same drivers would not do this in a smaller car because they don't feel as protected from the consequence of their actions. Which I think brings us to these accidents caused by tire failures. I think you're around my age, which means we were driving before steel belted radials became common. I remember having many tire failures and blowouts in the late sixties on long trips. I had never heard of a car overturning because of tire failure. So I'm puzzled why a failure of 100 tires in 10 or 20 million is considered significant. In the late 1960's I used to work for a trucking company and it was simply impossible to drive across the country without shredding a few tires.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext