SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DownSouth who wrote (31364)9/10/2000 3:32:39 PM
From: Eric L  Read Replies (3) of 54805
 
OK DS,

Re: Palm - Handheld Game

Ya done <deleted> your post so presumably you are editing.

I think you said something about whether or not the Palm Platform architecture proprietary and open.

My gut is it is sufficiently proprietary and it sure is VERY open which is the advantage they have enjoyed over MSFT (CE/Pocket PC) which is why MSFT is starting to open things up to compete.

BTW: I got into Palm after IPO at on 3/6/00 at $70 and exited one week later at $67. It is at $45 today.

Actually I had 25 shares at IPO so my actual loss was a tad less than $3 per share, maybe $2.80.

I was parking some QCOM sold at $143 (the good old days). The $ wound up adding to NTAP so they wound up being sagely invested.

Reason for the quick in and out was threefold. 1.) Mr. Market was going whacko. 2.) I had done insufficient DD. 3.) This august body had not sliced and diced it.

Certainly a Project Hunt Report is in order (as I think you said before you so rudely deleted <g>).

Price looks right on this sucker (maybe) if we can substantiate the proprietary open architecture and verify the tornado.

I tend to look at this Handheld Game as a sector of the 2.5G wireless voice and data tornado that I'm trying to get a fix on.

- Eric -
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext