SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rrufff who wrote (6140)9/10/2000 7:51:26 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (2) of 19428
 
rruff, let me make it clear that those were not my suggestions and that I posted it merely to answer the questions that sommovigo had been asking so persistently. I do not endorse any idea that will slow down the free flow of information and opinions. I disagree with the premise that a licensed individual should not be allowed to publish his or her opinions anonymously, and that such publication is de facto evidence of manipulation. i believe the compelling interest in restricting the speech of licensed individuals is wrt the influence that having the license gives to the person. By publishing anonymously, that influence is de facto abrogated. Regardless, an individual who accepts licensure has accepted being regulated at a higher standard than unlicensed folks.

To implement your plan wrt unlicensed individuals is plainly a violation of the 1st Amendment. Try to come to grips with your anger towards folks who disagree with you concerning the price of a security.

Regards,

Barb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News