The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.

QCOM 179.02

+3.7%

Nov 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (2083)	9/10/2000 11:04:36 PM
From: quartersawyer	Read Replies (2) of 12231

The substantial difference is that I trust Dr. Moulder's science as the best that can be done so far. He admits he's unsure, that there's no proof of safety. His careful work is not at the epidemiological level, but at the cellular level, approaching your molecular hypothesis. There is ongoing work. I personally would not call myself a great sculptor having fully visualized a great polished flying horse, nostrils flared and tendons taut ... so why bother with the messy and possibly unsuccessful job of removing the mass of chips and dust encasing the vision. Real science is work. I'm not worried because the existing science has been well done and depicts a situation that is not worrisome.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next