Re: IPMCF (off topic, but response to message on this thread)
LET US SAY I KNOW,LEAVE AT THAT.
I would normally e-mail this to you, but, gee, you don't have an e-mail address on your profile (which, BTW, does nothing for your credibility).
There are many of us who would be quite interested in the basis of your conclusion about IPMC/IPMCF. You may, indeed, be correct. However, I have no reason to believe you. Nothing personal: when it comes to a medium like SI, I have precious little reason to believe anyone.
Now, if you are interested in helping investors avoid losses (a motive I cannot just grant you), you can enhance your ability to do this by giving investors in IPMCF the clarity to make the right decision.
This is not a flame, but a challenge. Some people would say you are just a shill for shorty. There is one worse accusation: that you could have helped investors avoid getting burned, but did not take the steps needed to provide that help.
I'm looking forward to your reply, one scotch man to another.
Pý (who has a weakness for a fine single-malt, himself) |
