The Critical Investing Workshop Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dr. David Gleitman who wrote (32777)	9/11/2000 4:25:52 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) of 35685

Dr Gleitman: What I'm planning to do if given the opportunity is sell 6 contracts of RMBS Jan/Feb calls ... regardless of the 'normal' volatility -- rather, the FUNDAMENTAL uncertainty underlying RMBS because of legal ramifications -- I want OUT. If I'm not 'given the opportunity,' will likely bail at a loss. For now. It's interesting to me, anyway, more 'patent lawsuits' appearing all over the place ... i.e. SNDK ... it doesn't surprise me, as I've worked in high tech 18 years in TX ... patents are the lifeblood of tech innovation ... What's interesting <LOL> to say the least, is that I'm now invested in companies that live or die by patents ... I used to take a rather passing, 'intellectual interest' in writing about this or that patented technology for my clients ... Watching the impact of lawsuits AS A SHAREHOLDER brings a wholly (or would that be 'holy' ... or both? LOL) new perspective to the issue of proprietary technological development. 'b-i-a' ###

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next