The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.

QCOM 173.20

-3.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: quartersawyer who wrote (2085)	9/11/2000 7:52:26 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) of 12231

Another Great Sculptor hands the dirty work on to an artisan to carve the rock: <SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 11, 2000--QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq: QCOM - news), pioneer and world leader of Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) digital wireless technology, and Tellus Technology Incorporated, a developer and manufacturer of wireless terminal products and Internet Protocol (IP) networking solutions, today announced that they have entered into a CDMA modem card license agreement. Under the terms of the royalty-bearing agreement, QUALCOMM has granted Tellus a worldwide license under QUALCOMM's CDMA technology and patents to design and market modem card products for CDMA and High Data Rate (HDR) applications. ``QUALCOMM is pleased to license its technology to Tellus Technology for the development of CDMA and HDR enabled wireless Internet solutions to fulfill the demand for wireless Internet connectivity in the rapidly expanding CDMA marketplace,'' said Steve Altman, president of QUALCOMM Technology Alliances. ``Tellus Technology further supports QUALCOMM's vision of providing CDMA-enabled devices with innumerable applications to consumers and businesses worldwide.'' > The real science is in the idea. That's why Einstein is the hero. He just came up with some ideas on paper. Other people build the giant accelerators under the Geneva countryside decades [now millennia] later Okay, maybe my [X]Xrays + [M]Microwaves = [2C]Cancer from boosted wave function energy for the electron which gets kicked off the bond and links a handy carcinogen in, isn't quite as cool as E = MC2, but it's quite good. X + M = 2C We get 2C rather than just C because the total energy a brain receives from ionizing background radiation is quite small compared with the total energy a 500 minute a month user gets from their combined background + cellphone dose. True, I have no idea what the total energy received from background ionizing radiation actually is, nor how much the cellphones contribute, but the equation won't look so good if the cellphone 500 minute per month energy is trivial compared with the total background energy received from the xrays and gamma rays etc. There is a challenge for a scientific artisan rock carver! They can prove my theory false by simply showing what must be easily available on the Web "total ionizing energy" received from background sources and then showing that "500 Minute a month energy" is not a blip on the total. So now I have to find out the total 500 minute a month energy and the background monthly energy from ionizing radiation. Then I'm ready to count tumours to see if I get 2C. THEN I should be able to collect my Nobel Prize. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next