Mark,
Thank goodness Pluvia (someone in Las Vegas) has caught a fundamental error that has fooled Roche, NIH, and, well, just about anybody else in the HIV scientific community (I am not a member of that community, but a close relative is). Pretty amazing, isn't it?
Now that's not nice. Remember with a 1.2 million population there are a few smart guys in Vegas... I recall Howard Hughes lived there...
As too your argument that since Roche continues with TRMS it means the trials were not flawed... Come on now, that's a little thin don't you think?
1. I spoke to 4 of the PI's who ran the flawed T-20 trials.
2. They all agreed the trial was flawed because it used two variables, and that the use of new anti-HIV cocktail, (as demonstrated by Durant's study), should have been given credit for part of the anti-HIV results shown in the trials.
Mark, I guess my point is... If the MD's who ran the trials agree the trial design was flawed and results cannot be attributed to T-20, why attack me for pointing this out?
Heck go after them, they all list their phone numbers on the Trimeris website.
Good Luck |
