SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 484.85-0.2%Dec 22 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mozek who wrote (49250)9/14/2000 1:44:23 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
< On what do you base that Dave? ... Have you tried it, or is this just another baseless, negative comment? >

My comments were based on product reviews in places like The New York Times, eWeek, PC World, byte.com, zdnet.com, and other places. Each of these reviews had headlines like "Windows ME is not for Me" (actually, two different articles had this same headline!) and "More Frills, Few Thrills..." The strong consensus is that Win ME is a good OS upgrade to pass up until your next machine purchase. Several reviewers reported that their reasonably new machines would not work with Windows ME.

As a matter of fact, I've only seen one positive review of Win ME, on CNET, but it was obvious that the reviewer had not actually tried to install or run the OS. This review said things like, "Microsoft says Windows Me is more stable and healthier overall than Windows 98." Everything was just copied from a MSFT press release.

Compared with the excitement around Apple's Mac OS X Beta release, the response to Win ME has been a real yawner.

<<It's too incompatible with too many machines, too many peripherals, and too much third-party software. >>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext