SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 486.50+0.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mozek who wrote (49260)9/14/2000 5:39:49 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Mike,

Here's another excerpt from a review of Windows ME:

<http://www.byte.com/column/BYT20000801S0006>
"Windows ME is Not for Me"
By Andy Patrizio

"After spending a month playing with the final code, I find myself back running Win 98 SE. Windows ME adds a lot of features that I had minimal or no use for, removed things I needed in my daily routine, and in general, was bloated, used more memory, and was actually more crash-prone."

"The final kicker is the lack of stability. Not a day went by without a Kernel32.dll failure in third-party applications, and I was getting constant out-of-memory errors. The PC Health feature was no help at figuring out what was causing the failure. That was enough for me."

Okay Mike, I did your homework for you. Now it's your turn.

I challenge you to search the Net for a single review of Windows ME, not on a MSFT web page or paid for by MSFT, where the reviewer actually installed Windows ME, and likes it.

Good luck!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext