SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 89.88-3.1%11:19 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (53404)9/14/2000 5:30:07 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Jim, here's another question. If RDRAM is supposed to be so bad in performance, why does Intel only publish SPEC2000 results with RDRAM-based platforms (both 820 and 840)? Why aren't there any SPEC2000 results with 815? Several possibilities:

1) The Conspiracy Theory: Intel is artificially inflating RDRAM performance. They figured that getting the highest SPEC2000 scores possible isn't as important as basing an entire multi-billion dollar business on illusion.

2) The Lack of Effort on 815/PC133: Intel does a wonderful job making the best use of RDRAM memory bandwidth in their SPEC benchmarking efforts. But what if Intel spent as much time and effort optimizing SPEC for 815/PC133?

3) The Advantage of RDRAM: Intel already knows that RDRAM is simply better for SPEC than PC133, period. Of course, that brings up the question: is SPEC an accurate reflection of real-world applications?

So what's your (final) answer?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext