SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.53+1.5%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (8571)9/15/2000 11:08:47 AM
From: Daniel SchuhRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
One final P4 spec number from billybob @ aces' message board. All numbers for 1.5ghz part

Specint2000 502
SpecFP2000 525

By comparison, the best posted scores for the P3 at spec.org are for 1ghz cumine, on an OR840 (dual rambus channel) system, Intel 5.0 compiler.

CINT2000 438 base, 442 peak
CFP2000 327 base, 335 peak

Again, the int scores don't look very impressive, 14.6% increase from a 50% clock increase. FP looks better, a 60.5% increase from a 50% clock increase. I think a fair amount of the FP jump comes from the faster bus, the spec FP things seem to be getting stream-like.

The couple posted Athlon scores are FP only, and aren't on the face of it competitive, till you go back and compare equivalent compilers. Again, it's nice that Intel has a whole compiler operation just to generate good spec numbers, but I don't think that'd be the best way for AMD to spend its money.

Cheers, Dan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext