SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Daytrading Canadian Stocks in Realtime $3.00 or less
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: the Chief who wrote (1377)9/15/2000 11:31:22 AM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) of 4065
 
Could be a 'short' fantasy ... if you catch my drift ... can you get a borrow?

There is a thread, started yesterday - Subject 36834

Dean, i never went to skool, but i read a couple books once, and imho principals who mispell 'principles' may not grasp quite all the principal principles of the sciences outside of the stock promotion game -

"Question:
Does Xogen's technology exploit stored
energy in water?
Answer:
Yes...... It is often said that you cannot get
more energy output than input. In it's standard
form, this is absolutely true. But lets take a
closer look. If we examine one gallon of
gasoline, the stored energy is huge. The power
needed to release this energy is merely that of
a spark, and as we all know, the energy
contained in a spark is tiny. This example can
be said by some to violate the laws of Physics.
The energy of a spark input equals vast energy
output . Therefore, it can be said that we violate
natures laws every time we turn the ignition
key, but as we know, this is not true, as we are
releasing the stored energy within the gasoline.
The ignition system in a car engine is the
energy release mechanism. If we examine one
gallon of water, the energy stored is even higher
than that of gasoline. Xogen doesn't release the
stored energy with a spark, but with well known
scientific principals which have stood the test of
time."

xogen.com

You ever see a scientific principal older than about a hundred and five? -g-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News