SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Exall Resources/Glimmer Resources

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CLK who wrote (1146)9/17/2000 8:23:48 PM
From: Winzer  Read Replies (1) of 1319
 
Can't see how Glimmer (the mine or the company) can make money in this poor POG environment.

Some of my statistics from a couple of years ago include:

MATN paid $1,400.000 for 1,250,000 shares of GME and maintained first RoR 124,561 held by a director (?Kent).

Matchewan (12,445,025 shares outstanding) acquired 43.7% interest in GME in January 1997.

The control of the 12,445,025 breaks down as follows:

5,055,725 (40.6%) are held directly or indirectly by Richard McCloskey. Also 342,965 (2.8%) directly. McChip Resources (MCS-T) 3,130,000 (25.2%). And 1,575,656 (12.7%) AnnaMay Flett/Boanne Investments and 7,104 with PH McCloskey and HPM McCloskey. For a total of 10,111,450. (81.2%) of MATN shares are controlled d/indirectly. This leaves about 18.75% controlled by the "investors".

Seems to me that this summary could be out of date because I think that MCS-T may have a bigger share in Glimmer directly. Some day I may find the time to update my analysis; but if the POG is allowed to trade freely (once Clinton leaves office) I can see these four (EXL, GME, MATN & MCS) doing some running after the top two tiers of gold companies make their rally.

Winzer
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext