SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 95.57+0.7%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sylvester80 who wrote (53737)9/18/2000 10:03:32 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (3) of 93625
 
sylvester80, Facts from Anand's benchmarks.
First let me restate for the thread I believe SDRAM will have =>80% share of the DRAM market in 2001, that P4 will ship <250Kunits in Q4'00, and P4 will ship <10 million units in 2001. All subjective, of course, but my predictions.
But since the subject of interest is DDR vs RDRAM, let's look at Anand's benchmark result's in that context. (Note that the test's were run with PC1600, not PC2100).

Benchmark DDR 1600 PC800

Content creation 36.2 27.3
Sysmark 2000 195 179
Quake Arena 122.1 114.4
Unreal tournament 79.5 71.6
Expendable 107.9 93.7
Intel media encoder 129 73
Intel Naturally spkg 123 111
Intel Adobe prem 91 64
Intel Video studio 69 107
I-Stream (Memory B/W) 487 352
FPU stream (Mem B/W) 596 468

We should see PC2100 benchmarks on optimized platforms in the next few months. They will be even more interesting.
The fact that both PC133 and DDR1600 beat RDRAM on 1GHz platforms should be of concern. Clearly RDRAM did not scale with CPU speeds.
JMHO's. (And since it will be some time before we know P4 penetration, I won't get in a p###ing contest on that issue).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext