Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steven Finkel who wrote (35299)	9/18/2000 3:18:54 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (1) of 57584

Steven, Thanks for info. I think that perhaps the confusion on EFCX comes in with the name of the company. Electric Fuel Corporation. The word Fuel when placed next to the word Electric implies fuel cell technology to most. . . . I realize they are referring to batteries as fuel. . .but that is the confusing part. Their logic is: Batteries are energy. . .fuel is energy. . .therefore Batteries are fuel. . . .and that is a fallacy. We could say that calories are energy. . .but they have nothing to do with batteries. Rande Is PS> CNBC has mentioned Ralph Bloch warning that if Nasdaq breaks through support it could re-test April's lows. And each time they say it, the market tanks a little more. If it is intentional, it is very effective.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next