SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 37.24-2.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (110370)9/19/2000 11:59:47 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Elmer - RE: "This Intel website may be showing something about Foster that Intel did not intend to make public at this time.."

Good find! Looks like you found a pretty good leak. I'm surprised Intel has kept some of this info secret until now.

"Jackson" technology, eh? I wonder if Willy has it. If it does that could be why it will limited to work in single processors systems. Even if Willy does it won't bring any gains to consumers who use Win98/ME unless Microsoft is doing Intel a favor and making Win ME multitreaded capable. The presentation says the code requires changes for Jackson technology to work. If they mean the apps then not every program will be able to take advantage of it.

I think Paul is correct when he said the presentation is old. The presentation refers to RCC, aka Reliance Computer Corp, aka ServerWorks. RCC changed its name to Serverworks on Jan. 25 this year. According to the file properties the presentation was "created" in 1996, but it could have just been based on a template created then. The properties say the article was last printed on Jan. 12 this year. Click on File->Properties to see this.

The presentation mentions only 1MB L3 cache. Probably because 2MB would be way too large for a .18 process. I wonder what Tony will say about only 1MB. I guess nothing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext