SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.
QCOM 174.810.0%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (2155)9/22/2000 7:55:55 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 12246
 
<font color=blue>M + X = C

Here are the sources of rem for most Americans. I suppose it's similar for most people in OECD countries.
physics.isu.edu

Radon is the biggie - over half the total dose. Gee! I'd have guessed about 20%.

We can discount medical x-rays since people won't use cellphones while they are getting medical x-rays, few of which would go into brains anyway. So people could use cellphones while having chest x-rays. Same for nuclear medicine.

I'm looking for energy levels which need that extra M boost to reach ionizing energy. These all seem to be ionizing without M. Certainly Radon decomposition is. So are medical x-rays which I suppose are over a relatively narrow spectrum. Same for nuclear medicine since those doses are also intended to be ionizing to smash up cells.

That leaves consumer products, other, cosmic, terrestrial and internal. Total = 33% of the total.

Most of that 33% will be ionizing in it's own right, not needing the M energy to bust a bond.

Normal background risk:
epa.gov
<For the entire dose of radiation we accumulate over a lifetime from natural background radiation, the risk of developing cancer is estimated to be about one in one hundred. >

...contd
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext