SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (763)9/23/2000 5:03:55 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (3) of 12465
 
Re: 9/20/00 - [TTN] Botti Brown Asset Management Denies False Accusations by Titan Corporation

( BW)(CA-BOTTI-BROWN) Botti Brown Asset Management Denies False Accusations by Titan Corporation

Business Editors/Legal Writers

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 20, 2000--San Francisco fund manager Botti Brown Asset Management, LLC today categorically denied allegations of defamation by Titan Corporation and questioned why Titan is contradicting Titan's subsidiary's recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on August 30, 2000, in which Botti Brown was named as a defendant on September 19, 2000, Titan accused Botti Brown of making false statements about Titan and two of its subsidiaries, Cayenta and SureBeam, that are in registration for initial public offerings this year. One of the key alleged false statements is that Cayenta is "a money losing software company." However, the Form S-1/A registration statement for Cayenta's IPO filed with the SEC on August 8, 2000 explicitly states: "We have incurred and expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future." Botti Brown stands behind the substance, good faith and proper purpose of its analysis of Titan and Titan's subsidiaries.

Botti Brown's opinions about Titan were contained in discussion notes for two dinner meetings with a small number of other San Francisco area portfolio managers. While Titan has asserted that these notes were widely distributed to Titan's institutional shareholders, Botti Brown has made clear to Titan that it has no knowledge of this and was not involved in any such distribution. The Titan complaint also alleges defamation by internet message board participants expressing their opinions on Titan stock. Again, Botti Brown has made clear to Titan that no one affiliated with Botti Brown has ever posted anything concerning Titan on an internet message board.

Botti Brown principal John Botti stated: "Titan's suit has no merit and will be defended vigorously. The suit appears to be an attempt by Titan to silence those who have raised questions concerning the value of Titan's stock. The securities markets require full and open discussion of information, including all viewpoints. A public company should not be using its power to sue those with opinions different from the company's, since that would chill the exercise of freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment and thwart the goals of the securities laws."

For further information, contact Kenneth G. Hausman or Barbara A. Winters at the law firm of Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, (415) 434-1600 (counsel for Botti Brown).

--30--dmo/cgo*

CONTACT: Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin
(Counsel for Botti Brown)
Kenneth G. Hausman or Barbara A. Winters, 415/434-1600

KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: LEGAL/LAW

businesswire.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext