SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
EDIG 0.00010000.0%Mar 20 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JimC1997 who wrote (15088)9/23/2000 8:56:16 AM
From: ekn  Read Replies (2) of 18366
 
I guess there are others who agree with me. neverthe less, I believe what i write, I disclose what I have NOW what I have done with making money on this stock and i have the balls to say in a public forum that i sincerely believe that edig managment has had a BIG hand in manipulating RB EDIG and it's investors. Can I prove this as fact? Personally no. Should I even be saying this publicly? No. Does it make sense? Absolutely. I beleive that individuals investors are drawn in by "I want to be a millionaire". "Micros OS as a standard" think global" all things digital" EDIG RB has twice the volume of any other RB message board. the volume of individual investors increased by 150% in a year, individuals are drawn toiit as it's constantly #1 on the RB volume list. BUT there is NO smart money in the stock. If anyone here thinks that smart money i.e institutions and funds CANT invest in a BB THEY ARE WRONG. If something so big, so spectacular was coming down the pipeline, there WOULD be interest. Bottom line JIMC, any institution would have the info on the goods before anyone here. If there wasnt something fishy edig would already be listed. There would not be 7 president letters in 7 months. there would not be DAILY updates from RP that make there way to RBEDIG, there would not be monthly hypes from OTCNN, there would not be bi-monthly radio talk shows. there would not be a VP who talks to 1000s of shareholders every day .And he wouldnt have to hype AT ALL becasue if you have something that big, that good, why in the world would you hype about it????? There is a LOT of circumstantial evidence to support what i say. Again, i do agree that there is some validity to whatever they are doing, I realize that 3 intel execs are on board but to what extent this means i am still in a fuzz. That being said this has been one helluva trading stock and i cannot deny that. But[imo] it also is ONE helluva shady stock that could easily IMPLODE fcking a lot of people.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext