Jon,
You have to be the biggest jackass that I have ever encountered in my life.
How does the fact that packers1 recounted three conversations that he had with Robert Putnam in his most recent 100 posts (which I pointed out to you, when you said that there were no conversations with Putnam in those posts) constitute my "lying" to you?
And if you weren't such a completely incompetent fool, incapable of even reading, let alone reasoning, you would see that those three messages appear to recount only two conversations that he had with Putnam, one of which occurred some indeterminate amount of time in the past.
By the way, Raging Bull reports that packers1 has posted a total of 1679 times. Of these, about 100 were on other stocks. That leaves the ratio of packers1 posts to Jon Tara posts at about 2 to 1, not 9 to 1.
But get back on point, you fool. The number of packers1 posts vs Jon Tara posts is irrelevant. The issue here is whether you fostered the efforts by ekn to convince investors that Robert Putnam, the Senior Vice President of e.Digital is posting messages under the alias "packers1" on the Raging Bull message board.
The primary "evidence" that ekn presented to support his claim about a company officer attempting to manipulate investors by posting anonymously is his statement that he had "counted over 250" Robert Putnam/packers1 conversations from messages on Raging Bull. You accepted that absurd statement at face value without even the most cursory check of the facts.
I did check those messages, even though I regularly read the Raging Bull message board and knew that ekn's claim was ridiculous. As I posted here, the number of conversations that packers1 reports is quite small and consequently ekn's claim that he "counted over 250" is simply a lie, intended to manipulate investors by building distrust for the company's senior management.
You are simply embarrassed by the fact that I pointed out the obvious intellectual dishonesty that you exhibit here.
Do yourself a favor and just walk away from this discussion. Each day you post such trash you continue to diminish whatever positive reputation you think that you have on Silicon Investor.
I am very surprised that you did not long ago adopt an alias to post under. I cannot imagine that any potential employer of your services would want to deal with a person with such an irrational mindset as you display on this board each day.
I have said this over and over to you, get some professional help with your glaringly obvious emotional issues.
JimC |
