Lies, damned lies, and statistics dept...
JimC wrote:
"By the way, Raging Bull reports that packers1 has posted a total of 1679 times. Of these, about 100 were on other stocks. That leaves the ratio of packers1 posts to Jon Tara posts at about 2 to 1, not 9 to 1."
First of all, you once again expose yourself in a lie. You yourself admit that only 100 out of 1679 posts - or about 0.6% of his posts - were to threads other than the EDIG thread.
Incidently, quite a number of those 100 posts that were made to other stock threads on RB were, in fact, about EDIG. He was touting EDIG on other threads. In fact, his very first post listed in his history is an EDIG tout to the WLGS thread. His second post is an EDIG tout to the IINN thread. Those are followed by 25 posts to the EDIG thread.
It is apparent that packers1 probably joined RB for the express purpose of touting EDIG, and had only a minor passing interest in any other stock.
Yet, you'd previously said:
"Nor did you note that packers1 has posted on a variety of stocks, so his total EDIG-related messages are probably not that many more than the 700(!!!!) or so Jon Tara EDIG messages since the end of January."
The number of posts that were made about a "variety of stocks" were, in fact, insignificant - 0.6%. Less than that, if you count the EDIG touts made on other boards.
A 2:1 ratio is hardly "not that many more".
Further, packers1's posting frequency has accelerated dramatically - to the point of having made 700 posts about EDIG within the past month. Think about it - you complain that I have posted so frequently here, yet packers1 has posted in ONE MONTH as many posts as I have made in 9 months. Shouldn't you be over on RB advising packers1 to tone it down and stop embarrasing EDIG shareholders?
I think you should give packers1 some of the medical advice you so like to so gladly hand out... |
