SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.82+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (55065)9/25/2000 10:53:56 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Scumbria,
The fact that a 200MHz FSB and PC1600 memory (50% faster than PC133 memory & FSB) can not outright show a clear advantage, speaks volumes why you are upset. DDR is D.O.A. like in dead dead dead. Nobody in their right mind pay 50% more for a mobo (let alone the price of sticks, and we have yet to see any PC2100 sticks for some reason which tells me that those have even more problems and will be that much more expensive). DDR is "too little, too late". The DDR numbers and cost are "too little too late too slow and too vaporware". As Intel said: "DDR does not fit into the desktop roadmap". And they were right on the money. SDRAM PC100/PC133 will eat DDR for lunch on the price sensitive value and mid range market. RDRAM will eat it for lunch on the high end market. DDR has no market. As RDRAM prices continue down, they will continue to take market share from SDRAM. DDR is dead dead dead.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext